Tier 2 Healthy Weight Management Service

Location

Bristol

Description

Delivery of targeted services for adults, children and families to provide healthy weight management services.

Total Quantity or Scope

This contract is to provide a range of targeted services to children, adults and families to support with healthy weight management. We are intending to award this contract to the incumbent provider following PSR direct award process C. The lifetime value of the contract is £927,000 and services will be provided from 01/04/2026 to 31/03/2029.

Award Detail

Award Criteria

CPV Codes

• 85323000 - Community health services

Indicators

• Award on basis of price and quality.

Legal Justification

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The standstill period begins on the day after the publication of this notice. Representations by providers must be made to the relevant authority by 23:59 on 27/02/2026. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR.

Other Information

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The standstill period begins on the day after the publication of this notice. Representations by providers must be made to decision makers by 27/02/2026 at 23:59. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR.' Any written representations should be sent to gabriel.mcevoy@bristol.gov.uk The decision to proceed with this award has been made by Nicola Scribens and Christina Gray. Conflict of interest forms were completed by all members of the project team and now potential conflicts of interest were identified The key criteria was weighted as follows: Improving access, reducing health inequalities, and facilitating choice (20%) Value (40%) Integration, collaboration, and service sustainability (20%) Quality and innovation (20%) Social Value (Pass/Fail) Following a scored evaluation process the provider scored 60/100 across the 4 scored criteria and passed the requirements of the social value criteria.