NHS Integrated 111 and Urgent Care Service (Yorkshire and Humber)

2. II.2.14.1

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 or the Procurement Act 2023 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the Standstill Period. Representations by providers must be made to the relevant authority by 26 March 2026. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award a contract under the PSR.Written representations should be sent to wyicb-kirk.procurement@nhs.net.Decision formally awarded.Decision made by: 2025/26 Yorkshire and Humber ICB Governance Boards03.03.26 West Yorkshire ICB Finance Investment Performance Committee (FIPC)Key Criteria and Basic Criteria Assessment: The key criteria have been applied to the review of the service with the adoption of a scoring approach. This includes the performance of the provider against the contractual Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).The existing provider is satisfying the contract and will likely satisfy the proposed contract to a sufficient standard. The criteria of the PSRC have been applied as follows:Quality and innovation (including performance): 50%Value: 20%Integration, collaboration and service sustainability: 10%Improving access, reducing health inequalities and improving choice: 10%Social value: 10%Scoring Matrix Applied:Quality and innovation (including performance): 34%Value: 16%Integration, collaboration and service sustainability: 8%Improving access, reducing health inequalities and improving choice: 8%Social value: 10%The existing provider scored 76% above 70%, which is the Contract Authority’s pass mark to proceed with the intent to award notice.For the other aspects of the key criteria, the Contracting Authority adopted its standard scoring matrix. This consisted of grading the information from the review of service against the requirements listed within the statutory guidance for the Provider Selection Regime. There were no conflicts of interests declared