Provision of APMS Services at Gordon Street Surgery

Location

72 Gordon Street<br/>Burton-on-Trent<br/>DE14 2JA

Description

NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Integrated Care Board intend to award a contract to East Staffs Primary Care Network for the Provision of APMS Services at Gordon Street Surgery following a robust Competitive Process.Representations by providers must be made to the relevant authority by 2400hrs (Midnight) on 23rd December 2025.

Total Quantity or Scope

NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Integrated Care Board intend to award a contract to East Staffs Primary Care Network for the Provision of APMS Services at Gordon Street Surgery following a robust Competitive Process.The contract is for a duration of 5 years, the start date is 7th May 2026 and will run until 6th May 2031 with an option for the commissioner to extend for a further 4 years until 6th May 2035.The estimated lifetime value of the contract (including extensions) is £11,207,097.This is an existing service and has been awarded to an existing provider.

Award Detail

Renewal Options

The contract is for a duration of 5 years, the start date is 7th May 2026 and will run until 6th May 2031 with an option for the commissioner to extend for a further 4 years until 6th May 2035.

Award Criteria

CPV Codes

• 85121100 - General-practitioner services

Indicators

• Options are available.
• Award on basis of price and quality.

Other Information

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Procurement Act 2023 do not apply to this award. The standstill period begins on the day after the publication of this notice. Representations by providers must be made to the relevant authority by 2400hrs on 23rd December 2025. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award a contract under the competitive process of the PSR.Written representations need to be sent via the Atamis e-tendering portal, Project Reference: C341036 - COMPETITIVE: Provision of APMS Services at Gordon Street SurgeryThe award decision makers are as below:Boards:Strategic Commissioning and Transformation CommitteeNHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Integrated Care BoardProject Group:Senior Primary Care Manager – Commissioning Lead & Evaluator – NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICBPrimary Care Programme Lead – SIRO & Evaluator – NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICBProcurement Officer - Procurement Lead – Arden & GEM CSUSenior Procurement Manager - Procurement Support – Arden & GEM CSUEvaluators:Primary Care Support Manager – Evaluator – NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICBSenior Project Manager - Evaluator – NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICBPrimary Care Finance Manager – Evaluator – NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICBLead Nurse for Quality and Patient Safety – Evaluator – NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICBSenior Clinical Quality Improvement & Assurance Manager – Evaluator – NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICBEquality Diversity Inclusion (EDI) Business Partner – Evaluator – NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICBDesignated Nurse for Safeguarding Children – Evaluator – NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICBLead IPC Nurse – Evaluator – NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICBPrimary Care Contract Manager – Evaluator – NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICBPlanning and Development Lead – Evaluator – NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICBSafeguarding Clinician – Evaluator – NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICBHead of Programme Finance Primary Care – Evaluator – NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICBHR Business Partner – Evaluator – NHS Midlands & Lancashire Commissioning Support UnitGP Partner – Evaluator – Sutton Coldfield Group PracticeThere was 1 perceived Conflict of interest identified throughout the process whereby an evaluator has a family member who is employed with a potential provider / bidder for this contract. This was acknowledged and logged and would be reviewed once the names of the bidders were disclosed with potential removal of the evaluator from the process, as the particular provider did not submit a bid the evaluator was able to maintain their position on the evaluation panel.The Key Criteria were weighted as follows;• Quality & Innovation – 10.00%• Value – 12.00%• Integration, Collaboration and Service Sustainability – 38.00%• Improving Access, Reducing Health Inequalities and Facilitating Choice – 30.00%• Social Value – 10.00%The weightings for the 5 key criteria were determined by the procurement panel to give appropriate relative importance to each of the sections in line with the commissioning expectations for the service. The criteria were weighted and prioritised based on the needs of the service.The preferred provider scored a pass on all of the Pass / Fail questions within the Basic Selection Criteria. The preferred provider also scored the highest overall for the Key Criteria Questions against the published scoring criteria (as set out at paragraph 27.3.2 of the 'Document 1 - Competitive Process – Overview and Instructions').